Well, this week was a take-me-down-a-fun-and-twisty-rabbit-hole week for sure! When my creative juices are sparked, I can be like a dog with a bone, playing with the ideas and not letting go, even staying up way past my bedtime. I thought the art activity this week was going to be my one and only exploration and then I started making videos for the reading summary! Ha. But this post is about the art activity.
I was assigned Bridges 2013 (along with Joy). The piece I selected was one of two by Margaret Kepner, an independent artist based in Washington, D.C. (Here is her website: http://mekvisysuals.yolasite.com/
Here is the piece from the Bridges 2013 section of Mathematical Art Galleries, specifically on this page:
| Trapezia Pastiche Margaret Kepner, 2013 |
| Mom's take on re-creating Kepner's art |
| Fabric pieces cut and ready for sewing |
I layered the top piece of trapezoids with a layer of batting and another piece of fabric for the batting and outlined the 16 trapezoids in stitching.
Next came the tiling of each of the 16 trapezoids and I knew this step was not going to get finished for this post - so I will edit another day with an update (or maybe a few along the way).
I had to play with sketching the tiling patterns to understand them and to find the base pattern/root. I have only done a few so far.
| Sketching the tiling patterns |
While I was sketching, I asked, "How does Kepner know that there are infinite patterns to tile trapezoids?" and as I was sketching for trapezoid B, I found an answer (see image above).
I spent some time hand-stitching the tiling for parts of trapezoids A, I and F (I didn't sketch F but after stitching A, I understood F).
| Stitching trapezoid A |
| Closer look at the stitching on trapezoid A |
| Trapezoid F |
| Trapezoid I - triangles that need fixing for scale |
| There is a lot more stitching to go! |
There is a lot more to do to cover the whole piece in the tiling by stitching. However, the process of just getting started really helped me explore the patterns in the art. For trapezoid A (blue), when I was sketching, I didn't at first see that adjacent "rows" were slightly different and by checking that I could repeat the row, I realized I needed to rotate two trapezoids that form a hexagon on alternate rows. By stitching the A pattern, and then exploring other patterns, I realized I could do the tiling for trapezoid F quite easily based on some of the patterns in A. When I went to stitch trapezoid I, I discovered that the tiling patterns on adjacent trapezoids on Kepner's art feed into each other and though I didn't reflect that in my piece (at least not yet - I may decide to correct it), I wouldn't have noticed that the tiling patterns join together if I hadn't been examining them so closely to figure out where to set up the stitching. I also made an assumption that for pattern I, I could fit it in the same width of "row" that I had done for A and F - and only after stitching it did I realize that my stitched trapezoids were too small and that the "row" for triangles has to be wider than the ones for a hexagon made of 2 trapezoids.
At first I worried that I had chosen a piece that was too simple and wouldn't stretch my thinking but now I continue to uncover new understandings of the tiling patterns each time I work with it. As I continue to work with this piece (I am quite determined to finish it sometime!), I want to explore more explicitly some questions Kepner asks about her patterns:
"Which ones have a primitive-cell size of 4? How many are fault-free? Hexagon-free? Are there tilings with only 1 vertex type? Any with 6? Which patterns have rotational symmetry? Mirror lines? No symmetry?"
Check back for updates!
References
Interesting how we think a piece is simple, but upon further inspection, it just isn’t so! I found the same thing with the piece I chose for this week!
ReplyDeleteI love how different your mom’s interpretation of the art piece was! Was her intention to match up the pieces after?
Can’t wait to see what you do next!
Oh, I have no idea what my mom's intentions were. Something got lost in translation on the phone (and she is 83 and I make note of things that don't seem to go cognitively right...but for this, I think it was just me not communicating clearly about the point of what I wanted to do...re-create, not re-imagine, the art). From our second conversation, I think she wanted to make a square block that could be replicated and then the blocks joined for a larger quilt. When I suggested she try it out of fabric I got told she'd spent enough time on my homework! haha!
ReplyDeleteI have 3cm of a cuff of a sweater sleeve left to knit and have I done that this week? NO! Stitching away on this thing instead! But it was fun - and I'll keep working on it. I think I'll put a black border around it to frame it later.
Wow! Math explorer extraordinaire: cross-curricular connections, embodied learning, funds of knowledge, collaboration, critical thinking, growth mindset, noticing, wondering, reflecting, proving, patterning, ...
ReplyDeleteWow, Sandra! I am so thrilled that you have delved deeply into Kepner's artwork and found so much in it already. And it is really lovely that your Mom has gotten involved -- even if she conceives of the whole project really differently. (Her view about creating squares might offer an insight to traditional quilting practices perhaps?) Your piece is coming out really beautifully, and I am sorry that the sweater cuff has had to wait... Great insights!
ReplyDeleteMy mom called today and asked what mark she got on the homework! She was happy that she got mentioned in a comment from the prof! She agreed that her approach was because of quilting traditionally being done in squares.
DeleteSweater cuff still isn't done. It's OK...it has been an on and off project for 2 years so far...I am very competent at getting distracted in trying new projects and having a bunch of unfinished ones laying around!