Before reading further, if you haven’t read my reading summary, please read at least the summary poem “Poems are made by erasing.”
This may have been my favourite week of the course so far; at least that is what the hours I have spent playing with and writing poetry this week tell me. It might be tied with the week were we re-created art and I got sucked into flow with tessellating trapezoids. My brain (and body) is a bit exhausted from late nights not noticing the clock but still needing to get up in the morning. Please forgive me if my writing is discombobulated in this post.
When I reflect on my classroom practice with poetry, I see that I connected math at least implicitly, if not explicitly. I admit I was somewhat neglectful of having kids engage with reading poetry (but when I had teaching partners, they were good at that), but loved exploring the writing of poetry with them. I had a book from Scholastic that I used a bunch that taught different forms (haiku, cinquain, limerick, acrostic, ballad, and others) through examining a few examples and then scaffolding the writing (then I had students develop a book of their own poetry with at least one example of each of these and a bunch more of their choice). We were mostly counting and noticing patterns – of lines, syllables, stress, rhythm. So, I can see the mathematics connected to poetry through these experiences but this week opened up my understanding to more ways that math and poetry live together in this world.
| 9x9square poem by JoAnne Growney cited in Glaz, 2019 |
| My poem structured on Pascal's Triangle |
It seems like we can define mathematical poetry pretty broadly (though some people want more constraints than others – I felt JoAnne Growney and Sarah Glaz differ on what is and isn’t mathematical poetry). So, to that end, my question is:
What is NOT mathematical poetry?
Notes for the 'stop' at
"Poems are made by erasing" in Glaz 2019
| Editing down "Poems are made by erasing" found poem |
The connection to math education here is the idea of math drafts. We allow students first, second, third, or more drafts in writing. When do we do that in math class? I was introduced to the idea of math drafts in an NCTM webinar that I only caught the end of and haven’t gone back to watch the whole thing. However, the part I did see gave me a good idea about the concept. The idea is that students take a break from a problem and circulate the room looking at other students’ incomplete work, offering feedback and gathering inspiration for their own work. They may go back to their own work and scratch things out, start again, or have a new idea that breaks them out of being stuck.
We can also give feedback to students on being more elegant or efficient. I don’t think elegance or efficiency should be the first goal when students are learning a concept, but as they are ready, they can develop this. For an example, I had a student who understood division using the partial quotient strategy but would only divide by 2, 5, or 10 (as I remember it – anyway, the numbers were small) even if dividing by 100 or 200 or 500 might have been more efficient. She didn’t mind working through long columns to get to her answer. I could tell she understood the concept and was able to slowly nudge her to increasing her initial numbers to be more efficient. I think this is like erasing words in writing poetry – getting rid of the extraneous to get at the essence. (If I had the inclination, I’d edit this blog post back by 1/3!)
Questions to ponder
What is NOT mathematical poetry?
What similarities do you notice between the creation of poetry or other writing and working with mathematical problems and solutions?
I’m curious to know what possibilities primary teachers see in writing mathematical poetry with students who have, generally, a smaller lexicon to draw from and relatively limited experience with math patterns and concepts compared to older students.