Over the past several days I found I was not only reflecting and making connections between the introduction, viewings, activities, and readings for this week but also thinking back over the experiences we have had over the whole course. Themes that emerged from my stops/pauses could be connected backward through the course.
Intergenerational Teaching and Learning
The idea of intergenerational teaching first came up to me
this week in the reading “’The spirit of the medicine will lead us back’: How
Avis O’Brien is guiding Elders to weave their first cedar hats”, an article by
APTN, and has been a theme over the course for me. So many of the activities we
have undertaken have given me the option to engage with crafts that I have
previously explored and have been taught to me by mom or grandmother (or both),
specifically knitting and quilting. Even in the first week, I went to my little
garden which connects me to my mom and my dad as gardening and growing food was
(and is) something we do as a family. I explored art through quilting, learned
about some of the mathematics of knitting, learned about mathematical ways of
seeing and describing patterns in quilts, and realized that I had previously
knit a mathematical object! When we were braiding this week, I thought of how
my dad gave my sister and I string and a pile of harvested onions and asked us
to figure out how to braid the onion tops together with string for support so
the onions could be hung for storage.
| Throw-back to Week 4 - bringing in quilting to mathematical art endeavors |
Often we think of intergenerational learning going in one direction, from older generations to younger generations. One of the spinners in the film “The art and geometry of rope making and yarn plying” noted that when she spins, she feels connected to all the spinners that came before her. However, in the APTN article, it is noted that weaving (with cedar, specifically) has been a cultural practice that “went to sleep” due to colonial laws imposed on Indigenous peoples and the people who are now Elders did not have experience learning and practicing weaving. Now it is people in younger generations, such as Avis O’Brien, who have learned to weave and are bringing the cultural practice to the Elders. For me, this connected to being able to virtually meet and learn from Evelyn Vanderhoop, a Haida weaver and artist, in my elective course HGSE 371 last summer. Even though she comes from a line of weavers, having learned from her grandmother and mother, she also travels to museums where woven pieces that were taken from the Haida are located to study the designs and patterns that may not have been seen in Haida Gwaii in recent times and brings the designs back to her woven robes, reintroducing them to the Haida of all generations. (Evelyn has a really wonderful Youtube channel where she posts videos of her simultaneously weaving and telling stories or teaching history from a Haida perspective – check it out here).
So, how do I relate this to the teaching of mathematics and
bringing “ancient and ancestral technologies” into mathematics classes? By giving
our students the opportunity to play with and explore traditional ways of
making things while exploring the mathematics, we are connecting them to
generations before and an aspect of being human and providing for ourselves. Susan
notes in this week’s introduction, by making we can “really appreciate how
lovely and skilled these technologies are, and how important they have been for
human thriving throughout the ages.” By making sure we explore ancient
techonlogies that are common across cultures but also from individual cultures
(especially those represented in our students), perhaps we might give students
an avenue to re-awaken some cultural practices and knowledge in their own families.
I imagine students going home and talking about their learning and families
perhaps taking time to explore connections to family history of making. The fact
that we explore mathematics in it might be a side benefit to connecting to
culture.
Question: What do you find are the benefits of exploring ancient
technologies through mathematics classes? What about modern technologies?
(Aside: I have been struggling throughout the course with the
privilege that is embodied in some of the activities and this came up again this
week. It almost seems contradictory to speak of privilege in relation to making
culture, especially when it is based in ancient technologies. Usually I am
connecting the concept of privilege to time. This week it came up for me in the
video Vested Interest. Following Sharon Kallis through the process of making
her vest, right from visiting the farm to collect fleece to adding pockets and the
final stitches, showed what a time-consuming process it is. Kallis has this
time because she is being paid as an artist-in-residence. Maybe this vest
project is an extreme example of creating without being consumers first, but I
think of single parents who are working multiple jobs to feed and cloth
multiple children and maybe also be taking care of aging parents or other
family members. It’s nice to say we need to connect to the land in order to
take care of the land, but in a system that oppresses large groups of the
population in many different ways, who are the people that can embrace the way
of being of foraging and upcycling and creating and making or even writing
mathematical dances, art, or poetry? I tied this back to the classroom because
it is here where we can provide that time to connect with the land and connect
with traditional practices of making and technology and give students those
experiences as a way to decolonize education and a small part of society.)
Mathematics as Inherent to and Inseparable from Artistic Endeavours
The idea of mathematics being inherent to and inseparable from various human endeavours really came to the forefront to me in the week about dance and I really connected with Karl Schaffer’s idea of the third space where math and dance combine in a way that each supports the other and where it is hard to distinguish between the two ways of knowing. I can see this in visual art, paper folding and sculpture, music, knitting, quilting, drawing, and everything with which we experimented over the course. Last week Joy and I had an exchange of how the Indigenous Math Network has Kaagan Jaad (Haida Supernatural Mouse Woman) as a symbol for the network and the connections Billy Yovanovich, a Haida carver and artist, makes the connection of how mathematics is like Mouse Woman, sneaking in to help us out. I see how mathematics is inside all of the activities we have done, helping us out but also how the craft/art/activity helps, in turn, in supporting our mathematical understanding. They work together in an interwoven way that squishes both together so they can’t be separated.
| Kaagan Jaad as photographed for Out of Concealment: Female Supernatural Beings of Haida Gwaii by Terri-Lynn Williams-Davidson (Image from: https://thelasource.com/en/2019/10/21/out-of-concealment-the-interconnectedness-of-femininity-the-supernatural-and-the-environment/) |
I, along with Joy, was in a meeting with the Lower Mainland
Math Contacts yesterday and we got into an interesting discussion about
Indigenous ways of knowing and Indigenous cultural practices and mathematics.
One of the members shared a beading project she did with students alongside and
Indigenous Education teacher. Even though there were specific mathematical
outcomes to the activity related to patterns, she noticed so much more
mathematics coming to life in how students were creating their projects –
counting, measuring, comparing, and much more. Her take-away from the project
was that we can start with an activity or project and then look for the
mathematics, rather than starting with a math concept and developing projects
from there.
Question: In planning activities with your students, are you
finding that you start with an activity and find the mathematics or start with
the mathematics and develop/find an activity that supports the math or a bit of
both? What do you prefer?
I connected with that idea of starting with the activity and
letting the mathematics support it because of how I have experienced
mathematics as an inherent part of the activities we have done. I could feel
the mathematics. I noticed this in the video about the rope making in Norway
and how the ropemaker seemed to feel the tension in the materials as she was
pulling the rope. I know when I played with the raw fleece to ply it, I was
feeling (sometimes more successfully than others) for how fast and hard I could
tug on it to pull the fibres without them disconnecting from one another and
then getting a feel for how tightly I needed to twist and ply to get a stable
piece of plied yarn. I know I feel the patterns when I dance, too, and hear and
feel patterns of notes when I play music. I have discovered and learned that feelings of having mathematics
inside my body, right down in my core, when I engage in different human
activities is what is meant by embodied mathematics.
Hi Sandra, I came too take a look at your wise words and appreciated reading "Her take-away from the project was that we can start with an activity or project and then look for the mathematics, rather than starting with a math concept and developing projects from there." I have been going about this course the wrong way and looking for relevancy to big ideas and content before just doing. Learning is a verb! Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThanks for coming by, Carol! It seemed this teacher was amazed at all the mathematical talk and thinking that was being used by the kids when she was really listening to them. The math was set to be about patterns, but so much more was happening.
DeleteI think of what I learned in a workshop about core competencies, once: Notice, Name, Nurture. So when you notice a student engaging with or exemplifying a core competency you name it for them and continue to nurture that action/engagement as you move forward with the student, maybe planning explicit activities that incorporate what you noticed. I think we could take this notice, name, and nurture approach with making in mathematics, to. Don't you?
Hi Sandra, yes I agree. I explained to my kids that if I see them meeting a competency, I name it , discuss with them what they have discovered and we document it on their goal sheet as met. I am so glad I popped by because I fear I maybe to hokey pokey for some as my kids tell me my marking is unusual so I am delighted to read I almost notice, name, nurture. I am feeling responsive to where they are at and discussing next steps is the type of assessment my kids need (we know as formative) but I think it is more holistic than a one shot assessment
Delete
ReplyDeleteI connected with your thoughts about the privilege in the Susan Kallis video this week as well. It really stood out to me that, although the work Susan was doing was valuable, it was unrealistic for many people in the world today. Just the time needed to learn the skills requires the privilege of time… and so many skills were needed for her to complete the clothing she was making. Yet, at the same time, I see value in not losing sight of how we view the world. For example, do we accept fast fashion as the way the world is, or by questioning where our clothing comes from and the process of how the clothing comes into our possession, are we part of a solution? Once we understand the impacts of fast fashion, it is easy to see that we need a better way – for people and for the planet.
Question: In planning activities with your students, are you finding that you start with an activity and find the mathematics or start with the mathematics and develop/find an activity that supports the math or a bit of both? What do you prefer?
In response to this question, I do both – start with the mathematics sometimes and other times I start with an activity. In creating our blog, Outdoor Math, for Cynthia’s class last term (and which we are adding to for our project this term), Jen W. and I started with the idea of bringing ecological justice into the math classroom. Starting with this idea, we wanted to connect students to the land, incorporate Indigenous ways of knowing and Indigenous storywork to mathematics. We decided to work with the more-than-human world of water as a storyteller. From there we are connecting students to finding math through listening to, getting to know and learning from water. Finding the math has been relatively easy and has opened my eyes to mathematics in the world in a whole new way (and to connecting students with this mathematics). This course has opened my eyes to so many new ways to connect students with mathematics that sneaks in to activities and parts of life (where we sometimes miss the mathematics). This course has also encouraged me to be brave and venture a little further outside my comfort zone… to see what I can find. It has been worth it.
Thank you for such a thorough reflection and the thought-provoking questions, Sandra! I really like the idea of starting with an activity or project and then looking for mathematics. As secondary math teachers, we tend to start with math concepts when designing a lesson activity. I had done a lot more open-ended, exploratory activities since the new curriculum was introduced, but usually I would still have some learning standards in mind. Sometimes math not intended could show up as pleasant surprises. I think the core and curricular competencies have given us more flexibility to think about it the other way around. Love the "notice, name, and nurture" approach!
ReplyDeleteYour question about technologies reminds me of your Scratch project. Your trapezoid tessellation project explored art and math through both quilting and coding. It is a wonderful example of doing traditional, ancestral technology as well as digital, modern technology!